![]() ![]() This is modelled as a conventional NURBS polysurface and one of the areas where we may have an advantage with SubD is in creating variations of this transition between the underside of the table and the table leg. The first example I’d like to take a look at is this table design. If you’re looking for a more in-depth video introduction to SubD in Rhino v7, what it is and why we need it, then I’d suggest looking at the video linked. I’m going to be using a Mac for this video, but the processes are, of course, also applicable to Windows. Whilst I’m looking at this, I’ll also show that SubD isn’t just about approximation – as Rhino SubD’s are spline based and have a set of specific commands just like their NURBS counterparts.įinally, I’ll look at using the new Multipipe command to quickly create viable geometry from simple lines, polylines and curves. Secondly, I’ll look at using the advantages of SubD to circumnavigate some of the unavoidable topology issues that occur in NURBS modelling. I’m going to look at three key areas where a SubD workflow could be preferable to NURBS.įirstly, I’ll look at creating and Adjusting Transitions. Hi, I’m Phil from Simply Rhino and in this video, I’m going to take a look at one of the most noteworthy new features in Rhino 7 – and that, of course, is SubD Modelling. Watch this Rhino 7 SubD Video here (if you’d like to follow the video transcript then you’ll find it at the foot of this page):
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |